Home Original page

Strange binutils-2_16-branch and related tags

Andreas Schwab schwab@linux-m68k.org
Fri May 8 17:15:00 GMT 2009 
Jie Zhang <jie.zhang@analog.com> writes:

> It seems you are right. Below is the list of all the files which should
> not have TAG binutils-2_16-branchpoint. They are just the new files when
> comparing TAG binutils-2_16-branchpoint against TAG binutils-2_16. I'll
> first try on a local repository mirror next week.

The file binutils/rclex.c is special.  It was previously a generated
file only checked into branches, but appeared later on the trunk as a
non-generated file.  This file should not have that tag either.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
More information about the Binutils mailing list