[Patch 2/4] Rewrite of the alpha-vms bfd back-end (bfd)
Tristan Gingold
gingold@adacore.com
Wed Apr 14 09:30:00 GMT 2010
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Wed Apr 14 09:30:00 GMT 2010
- Previous message (by thread): [Patch 2/4] Rewrite of the alpha-vms bfd back-end (bfd)
- Next message (by thread): Binutils documentation: info format
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Apr 13, 2010, at 1:12 PM, Nick Clifton wrote: > Hi Tristan, [...] > > Approved - please apply. Thanks, committed with the suggested improvements. Tristan. > > Some comments: > > +/* Read & process EIHD record. > + Return 0 on success, -1 on error */ > + > +static int > +_bfd_vms_slurp_eihd (bfd *abfd, unsigned int *eisd_offset, > + unsigned int *eihs_offset) > > Why not use bfd_boolean as the return type here ? (And for other, similar functions ...) > > > + sprintf (name, "$%s_%03d$", pfx, section_count++); > > Is it (theoretically) possible to have more than 999 EISD records ? If so then maybe an assertion or range check would be appropriate here. > > > Cheers > Nick >
- Previous message (by thread): [Patch 2/4] Rewrite of the alpha-vms bfd back-end (bfd)
- Next message (by thread): Binutils documentation: info format
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list