VMA section overlap warnings for overlays
H.J. Lu
hjl.tools@gmail.com
Thu Jul 15 14:26:00 GMT 2010
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Thu Jul 15 14:26:00 GMT 2010
- Previous message (by thread): VMA section overlap warnings for overlays
- Next message (by thread): VMA section overlap warnings for overlays
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 7:17 AM, Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 06:53:39AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Andreas Schwab <schwab@redhat.com> wrote: >> > The sh_offset of .branch_lt no longer agrees with sh_addr modulo segment >> > alignment. >> >> What is an empty section used for? > > This particular section stores addresses used by long branch stubs. > I'd be happier if it was eliminated when no long branch stubs were > needed, but that turns out to be difficult. So unfortunately ppc64 > binaries get these zero sized sections. > Is that a problem when it isn't included in any segment by objcopy/strip? -- H.J.
- Previous message (by thread): VMA section overlap warnings for overlays
- Next message (by thread): VMA section overlap warnings for overlays
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list