VMA section overlap warnings for overlays
Alan Modra
amodra@gmail.com
Fri Jul 16 10:04:00 GMT 2010
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Fri Jul 16 10:04:00 GMT 2010
- Previous message (by thread): VMA section overlap warnings for overlays
- Next message (by thread): VMA section overlap warnings for overlays
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 09:39:16AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com> writes: > > > Why does an empty section affect section layout? > > ??? That's the bug. I think we could probably remove all the sh_size != 0 tests associated with ELF_SECTION_IN_SEGMENT in elf.c. I'm not sure why they were there in the first place, possibly to cover bugs in the precursors to ELF_SECTION_IN_SEGMENT. If we do that, then any zero size load/alloc sections will be added to a segment map by copy_elf_program_header for objcopy and strip, just as they are for ld. Then the zero size sections will be handled by assign_file_positions_for_load_sections and placed with other load sections, rather than being shunted off to assign_file_positions_for_non_load_sections. -- Alan Modra Australia Development Lab, IBM
- Previous message (by thread): VMA section overlap warnings for overlays
- Next message (by thread): VMA section overlap warnings for overlays
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list