Can objdump show friendly symbolic function name?
Maciej W. Rozycki
macro@linux-mips.org
Tue Jul 20 11:42:00 GMT 2010
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Tue Jul 20 11:42:00 GMT 2010
- Previous message (by thread): Can objdump show friendly symbolic function name?
- Next message (by thread): Can objdump show friendly symbolic function name?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010, Richard Sandiford wrote: > It would certainly be possible to do the same thing in objdump, > and FWIW, I did wonder about that when adding the readelf -A GOT dump. > The problem is that, in a multi-GOT world, the annotations are only > ever going to be a best guess. If the disassembler sees: > > lw $2,-32000(gp) > > it doesn't in general know whether gp points to the primary > (ABI-defined) GOT, or to some secondary GOT. If it guesses > right, the annotation would be useful, but if it guesses wrong, > the annotation would be very misleading. This is different from > the current <foo> markers, which are always accurate (or at least, > _should_ always be accurate). Can the GOT pointer switch between GOTs within a single function? Maciej
- Previous message (by thread): Can objdump show friendly symbolic function name?
- Next message (by thread): Can objdump show friendly symbolic function name?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list