PR ld/12253 DW_EH_PE_datarel
Rainer Orth
ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE
Fri Nov 26 18:35:00 GMT 2010
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Fri Nov 26 18:35:00 GMT 2010
- Previous message (by thread): PR ld/12253 DW_EH_PE_datarel
- Next message (by thread): PR ld/12253 DW_EH_PE_datarel
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> writes: > On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 05:35:01PM +0100, Rainer Orth wrote: >> Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> writes: >> >> > On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:57:25AM +1030, Alan Modra wrote: >> >> architecture dependent, it is also context sensitive. When used in >> >> .eh_frame_hdr, DW_EH_PE_datarel means relative to the .eh_frame_hdr >> >> section. >> > >> > Yeah, I'm sorry for that, but it is documented that way and >> >> Is there any written/formal documention for that, other than binutils >> and gcc (gcc/unwind-fde-dw2-glibc.c) sources? > > The comment in elf-eh-frame.c in binutils is the written documentation: I rather meant the meaning of DW_EH_PE_datarel in .eh_frame sections, cf. Alan's comments 2 and 4 in the PR. I'd have expected that the LSB could be implemented just from the specification without referring to comments in some particular implementation. There are LSB architecture supplements, but they are silent on the subject. The base document is (intentionally?) vague to the point of being useless. Rainer -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
- Previous message (by thread): PR ld/12253 DW_EH_PE_datarel
- Next message (by thread): PR ld/12253 DW_EH_PE_datarel
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list