gnu_indirect_function support in front and back ends
Alan Modra
amodra@gmail.com
Fri Oct 8 04:11:00 GMT 2010
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Fri Oct 8 04:11:00 GMT 2010
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH,committed,toplevel] Sync configure.ac with gcc@165133
- Next message (by thread): gnu_indirect_function support in front and back ends
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:03:09PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > the trouble is that glibc uses this simple test to figure out whether to > enable a multiarch build. if using binutils-2.20 for a target that doesnt > support this stuff, glibc will still enable it. Well, we can't go back in time to fix old binutils releases, so it seems that glibc will need a better test. Perhaps look for R_*_IRELATIVE relocs? -- Alan Modra Australia Development Lab, IBM
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH,committed,toplevel] Sync configure.ac with gcc@165133
- Next message (by thread): gnu_indirect_function support in front and back ends
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list