SEC_NEVER_LOAD cleanup
Kai Tietz
ktietz70@googlemail.com
Mon Oct 18 06:22:00 GMT 2010
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Mon Oct 18 06:22:00 GMT 2010
- Previous message (by thread): SEC_NEVER_LOAD cleanup
- Next message (by thread): SEC_NEVER_LOAD cleanup
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
2010/10/18 Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>: > On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 10:08:07PM +0200, Kai Tietz wrote: >> Maybe it is a general failure >> to assume (at least for pe-coff, but maybe for elf, too) that NOLOAD >> means to discard sections from linking? > > Possibly. Can you say exactly how NOLOAD should behave from a COFF > perspective? ie. what STYP_NOLOAD ought to do? > > -- > Alan Modra > Australia Development Lab, IBM > According to pe-coff specification NOLOAD means that a section has neither allocation nor the load flag set. For example .debug* or .metadata sections have this style described in pe-coff specification. They are part of the image without being mapped into process-memory on module load time, but have content and have image-file pointers. Regards, Kai -- | (\_/) This is Bunny. Copy and paste | (='.'=) Bunny into your signature to help | (")_(") him gain world domination
- Previous message (by thread): SEC_NEVER_LOAD cleanup
- Next message (by thread): SEC_NEVER_LOAD cleanup
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list