Free words in section
Dave Korn
dave.korn.cygwin@gmail.com
Wed Oct 20 14:26:00 GMT 2010
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Wed Oct 20 14:26:00 GMT 2010
- Previous message (by thread): Free words in section
- Next message (by thread): RFC: COMDAT group names become anonymouse local symbols
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 20/10/2010 11:32, Paulo J. Matos wrote: > Paul Koning <paul_koning@dell.com> writes: > >> What does "free" mean? And why is it interesting? It's hard to see what you're after. >> > > Sorry if I mis-explained myself. > We are writing sections of a certain constant size, which might not be > completely full, meaning parts of the sections don't have useful words > but zero. What I am trying to calculate is the number of words which are > zero and meaningless. > > This is useful for example to know, how much more space we still have in > a data / constant / program section. > Do you mean the amount of padding added by LD? That can be read from the map file output; look for the "*fill*" entries. cheers, DaveK
- Previous message (by thread): Free words in section
- Next message (by thread): RFC: COMDAT group names become anonymouse local symbols
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list