Chris Demetriou cgd@google.com
Fri Sep 3 23:01:00 GMT 2010

• Previous message (by thread): PATCH: PR gas/11974: windows x86_64 sign extension
• Next message (by thread): binutils 2.20.1 not mentioned on web site, not tagged?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

Hi,

for various reasons I was just looking a bit more closely at the 2.20.1 release.

I note that it's not mentioned on the web site
(http://sourceware.org/binutils/), and also (worse) doesn't seem to be
tagged in CVS!
(e.g., search for "CVS Tags" on
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/binutils/ChangeLog?cvsroot=src&only_with_tag=binutils-2_20-branch)

(I also saw the thread at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2010-03/msg00066.html about some
other irregularities.)


I don't really care about the lack of web site announcement, or other
oddities, but the lack of tagging causes me concern...
Should somebody go back and try to find the right date (ugh ... i
"miss" using CVS all the time 8-) to tag the release?


thanks,

chris

---

• Previous message (by thread): PATCH: PR gas/11974: windows x86_64 sign extension
• Next message (by thread): binutils 2.20.1 not mentioned on web site, not tagged?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Binutils mailing list