[PATCH] ld: Failing to copy processor specific flags for split-by-file
Nick Clifton
nickc@redhat.com
Tue Sep 7 15:11:00 GMT 2010
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Tue Sep 7 15:11:00 GMT 2010
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] ld: Failing to copy processor specific flags for split-by-file
- Next message (by thread): Bcwvxnd Iitd
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Andrew, > I was wondering if there was anything I could do that would > help get these patches merged? Pinging the list like that was just the thing. > ...or should I just be more patient :) Actually it would also have helped if you had filed a bug report for this problem with the bugzilla system. That way there would be a PR number that we could refer to in changelog entries and comments in the code. > I've attached two patches, split-test.patch, contains the test that > highlights this problem. Thanks. I have applied both patches. I also had to make up some changelog entries for them (see below). If you can include such entries yourself when submit patches in the future it will make things a little bit easier. > I'll be honest, I don't really understand > what the "l" flag is used for, but I don't *think* that it makes any > difference for the purpose of this test. It doesn't make a huge difference, although there is a need for the presence of an unusual flag, such as "l". Using "l" did point out one other small problem to me, which was that readelf was not explaining what "l" stands for in the "Key to Flags" part of its output. So I created a small additional patch to do this. Cheers Nick ld/ChangeLog 2010-09-07 Andrew Burgess <aburgess@broadcom.com> * ldwrite.c (clone_section): Call bfd_copy_private_section_data on newly cloned section. ld/testsuite/ChangeLog 2010-09-07 Andrew Burgess <aburgess@broadcom.com> * ld-x86-64/split-by-file.rd: New test. * ld-x86-64/split-by-file1.s: New test source code. * ld-x86-64/split-by-file2.s: New test source code. * ld-x86-64/x86-64.exp: Run the new test. readelf/ChangeLog 2010-09-07 Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com> * readelf.c (process_section_headers): Mention meaning of 'l' section flag for x86-64 targets. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: readelf.c.patch Type: text/x-diff Size: 1447 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/attachments/20100907/7f0088c3/attachment.bin>
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] ld: Failing to copy processor specific flags for split-by-file
- Next message (by thread): Bcwvxnd Iitd
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list