Question about archive search behavior vs. --defsym
Mark Mitchell
mark@codesourcery.com
Thu Sep 9 16:39:00 GMT 2010
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Thu Sep 9 16:39:00 GMT 2010
- Previous message (by thread): Question about archive search behavior vs. --defsym
- Next message (by thread): Question about archive search behavior vs. --defsym
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 9/9/2010 9:37 AM, H.J. Lu wrote: >>> OK. Is this a structurally hard thing to fix? Or just something that >>> would take some effort? And, does GOLD handle this correctly? > 1. The symbol value may not be known at the time. Yes, but this is just an implementation issue; you have to do a fixup later in the link process. > 2. It should override symbol defined in an object file. Of course. What point are you making? Are you arguing that the current behavior is desirable, or just that fixing it is not entirely trivial? -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery mark@codesourcery.com (650) 331-3385 x713
- Previous message (by thread): Question about archive search behavior vs. --defsym
- Next message (by thread): Question about archive search behavior vs. --defsym
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list