Tristan Gingold gingold@adacore.com
Wed Sep 15 07:37:00 GMT 2010

• Previous message (by thread): [patch x64 SEH]: Sort pdata section ascending
• Next message (by thread): [patch gas/testsuite SEH x64]: Some initial tests about SEH pseudo-operators
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On Sep 14, 2010, at 10:06 PM, Dave Korn wrote:

> On 14/09/2010 19:23, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> On 09/14/2010 10:18 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> 
>>> +  bfd_vma vl, vr;
>>> +  vl = bfd_getl32 (lp); vr = bfd_getl32 (rp);
>>> +  if (vl != vr)
>>> +    return (vl < vr ? -1 : 1);
>>> +  vl = bfd_getl32 (lp + 4); vr = bfd_getl32 (rp + 4);
>>> +  if (vl != vr)
>>> +    return (vl < vr ? -1 : 1);
>>> +  vl = bfd_getl32 (lp + 8); vr = bfd_getl32 (rp + 8);
>>> +  if (vl != vr)
>>> +    return (vl < vr ? -1 : 1);
>>> +  return 0;
>> 
>> Isn't the start address the only thing that matters here?
>> We really shouldn't have overlapping entries.  Certainly
>> the pointer into the .xdata section should not be included
>> in the sort order; that's totally irrelevant.
> 
>  BTW, are we OK with requiring GCC to build binutils, or is the code meant to
> be ANSI compatible?  I can't remember where this is documented.

Please, stay with ISO-C 90.

Tristan.

---

• Previous message (by thread): [patch x64 SEH]: Sort pdata section ascending
• Next message (by thread): [patch gas/testsuite SEH x64]: Some initial tests about SEH pseudo-operators
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Binutils mailing list