[SPU] bugs in .fixup section code
Alan Modra
amodra@gmail.com
Thu Sep 16 10:35:00 GMT 2010
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Thu Sep 16 10:35:00 GMT 2010
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH][ARM] Fix handling of GOT_PREL in gas.
- Next message (by thread): [SPU] bugs in .fixup section code
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Trevor, I was going through old email in my inbox, and I don't think I replied to this email. Apologies for that, and hope to make amends by the patch I'm about to apply. On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 06:09:12PM -0800, Trevor_Smigiel@playstation.sony.com wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed a couple of issues with the .fixup code for the SPU target. > The patch was discussed and commited here: > http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-08/msg00052.html > > The first issues is that it allocates fixup records for debug sections. > I think that testing the SEC_ALLOC flag is the best way to filter them > and other sections out. Is that correct [snip] Yes. > The second problem is that the contents of the fixup output section are > getting set too soon. The fixup section is attached to the first input > bfd, which causes it to get copied to the output section early in > bfd_elf_final_link while it is relocating sections, but the fixup > section contents are still being updated while relocating later > sections. > > Here are 2 approaches I'm considering to fix this. They both have the > effect of calling bfd_set_section_contents for the fixup section after > all section relocations have been completed. > > First approach, create the .fixup section as a dynamic section. Set the > SEC_LINKER_CREATED flag and set htab->elf.dynobj to be the first input > bfd, where the .fixup section was created. In this case, I am not sure > of all the effects of setting htab->elf.dynobj. If there aren't any > issues, I think this is the slightly better solution. [snip] Agreed. > And a final question about testing. To create a test case for this I > will need at least 2 source files. Is the correct approach to write > explicit commands for this test in ld-spu/spu.exp? Similar to > embed_test that is in the same file. You can specify multiple source files in the .d file. See ld/testsuite/ld-elf/warn1.d for an example. * elf32-spu.c (spu_elf_size_sections): Omit fixups for non-alloc sections. (spu_elf_create_sections): Mark .fixup with SEC_LINKER_CREATED and set dynobj. (spu_elf_finish_dynamic_sections): New function. (elf_backend_finish_dynamic_sections): Define. Index: bfd/elf32-spu.c =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bfd/elf32-spu.c,v retrieving revision 1.97 diff -u -p -r1.97 elf32-spu.c --- bfd/elf32-spu.c 25 Aug 2010 14:53:44 -0000 1.97 +++ bfd/elf32-spu.c 16 Sep 2010 10:31:09 -0000 @@ -602,9 +602,12 @@ spu_elf_create_sections (struct bfd_link { asection *s; flagword flags; - ibfd = info->input_bfds; - flags = SEC_LOAD | SEC_ALLOC | SEC_READONLY | SEC_HAS_CONTENTS - | SEC_IN_MEMORY; + + if (htab->elf.dynobj == NULL) + htab->elf.dynobj = ibfd; + ibfd = htab->elf.dynobj; + flags = (SEC_LOAD | SEC_ALLOC | SEC_READONLY | SEC_HAS_CONTENTS + | SEC_IN_MEMORY | SEC_LINKER_CREATED); s = bfd_make_section_anyway_with_flags (ibfd, ".fixup", flags); if (s == NULL || !bfd_set_section_alignment (ibfd, s, 2)) return FALSE; @@ -5096,6 +5099,13 @@ spu_elf_relocate_section (bfd *output_bf return ret; } +static bfd_boolean +spu_elf_finish_dynamic_sections (bfd *output_bfd ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED, + struct bfd_link_info *info ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED) +{ + return TRUE; +} + /* Adjust _SPUEAR_ syms to point at their overlay stubs. */ static int @@ -5402,7 +5412,8 @@ spu_elf_size_sections (bfd * output_bfd, /* If there aren't any relocs, then there's nothing more to do. */ - if ((isec->flags & SEC_RELOC) == 0 + if ((isec->flags & SEC_ALLOC) == 0 + || (isec->flags & SEC_RELOC) == 0 || isec->reloc_count == 0) continue; @@ -5457,6 +5468,7 @@ spu_elf_size_sections (bfd * output_bfd, #define elf_info_to_howto spu_elf_info_to_howto #define elf_backend_count_relocs spu_elf_count_relocs #define elf_backend_relocate_section spu_elf_relocate_section +#define elf_backend_finish_dynamic_sections spu_elf_finish_dynamic_sections #define elf_backend_symbol_processing spu_elf_backend_symbol_processing #define elf_backend_link_output_symbol_hook spu_elf_output_symbol_hook #define elf_backend_object_p spu_elf_object_p -- Alan Modra Australia Development Lab, IBM
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH][ARM] Fix handling of GOT_PREL in gas.
- Next message (by thread): [SPU] bugs in .fixup section code
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list