Home Original page

[PATCH][GAS/ARM] Better handling of difference between a symbol and an undefined symbol.

Doug Kwan (關振德) dougkwan@google.com
Tue Sep 28 01:38:00 GMT 2010 
Sounds like a good suggestion, I will change the test case then.

在 2010年9月27日下午6:35，Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@gmail.com> 寫道：
> On 28/09/2010 00:53, Doug Kwan (關振德) wrote:
>> Absolutely, I would like to use something like:
>>
>>         .section        .data.i,"a"
>> i:
>>         .long   0
>>
>>         .section        .data.j,"a"
>> j:
>>         .long   i - (. - .L1)
>> .L1:
>>
>> The problem is that I cannot guarantee that it assembles for all
>> targets.  Is there a good way to test that?
>
>  I think if you just use a .section directive with only a section name and no
> flags, that ought to assemble everywhere.  Since it's an assembler-only test
> that doesn't need a compiler, you can easily run a script that builds and
> tests binutils for a whole huge list of cross-targets and see whether it fails
> anywhere.  (I'll send you a copy off-list if you'd like.)
>
>    cheers,
>      DaveK
>
More information about the Binutils mailing list