Generating ancilliary sections with gas
Dave Martin
dave.martin@linaro.org
Wed Feb 2 10:28:00 GMT 2011
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Wed Feb 2 10:28:00 GMT 2011
- Previous message (by thread): Generating ancilliary sections with gas
- Next message (by thread): New Danish PO file for 'opcodes' (version 2.20.90)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 11:48 PM, Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> wrote: > Have you seen http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2010-08/msg00121.html ? That's interesting--- I hadn't fully understood what this did. I'm not sure it solves my problem though: I need to generate ancillary sectiions relating for normal sections, and I need the relationship to be visible in the name so that a linker script can remove related sections in a sane way. I think my proposal allows for a solution to the general problem of allowing assembler directives to do things based on the current assembler state, where "?" solves only a specific instance of that problem, just allowing .section and related directives to do something quite specific based on a specific property of the assembler state (the current section group name). If I'm wrong and you can see how to solve my problem, I'd definitely be interested though. Cheers ---Dave
- Previous message (by thread): Generating ancilliary sections with gas
- Next message (by thread): New Danish PO file for 'opcodes' (version 2.20.90)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list