[PATCH, go] Re: Should rename ELFOSABI_LINUX into ELFOSABI_GNU, and drop ELFOSABI_HURD
Ian Lance Taylor
iant@google.com
Tue Jul 5 20:39:00 GMT 2011
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Tue Jul 5 20:39:00 GMT 2011
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH, go] Re: Should rename ELFOSABI_LINUX into ELFOSABI_GNU, and drop ELFOSABI_HURD
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH, go] Re: Should rename ELFOSABI_LINUX into ELFOSABI_GNU, and drop ELFOSABI_HURD
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Thomas Schwinge <thomas@schwinge.name> writes: > The only ELFOSABI_* occurrences in GCC trunk are in libgo. > > Ian, what do you think about the following patch (untested -- what > testing does this need)? Is it even worth keeping the ELFOSABI_LINUX > alias? (It can never be returned via osabiStrings.) These files are simply copied directly from the master Go library, so the change should be made there. See libgo/README and http://golang.org/doc/contribute.html. I can probably take care of it at some point if you don't want to bother. Ian
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH, go] Re: Should rename ELFOSABI_LINUX into ELFOSABI_GNU, and drop ELFOSABI_HURD
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH, go] Re: Should rename ELFOSABI_LINUX into ELFOSABI_GNU, and drop ELFOSABI_HURD
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list