PATCH: Add --size-check=[error|warning]
Andreas Schwab
schwab@redhat.com
Mon Mar 14 14:11:00 GMT 2011
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Mon Mar 14 14:11:00 GMT 2011
- Previous message (by thread): PATCH: Add --size-check=[error|warning]
- Next message (by thread): PATCH: Add --size-check=[error|warning]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> writes: > * Andreas Schwab <schwab@redhat.com> wrote: > >> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> writes: >> >> > * Andreas Schwab <schwab@redhat.com> wrote: >> > >> >> Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> writes: >> >> >> >> > Hi Andreas, >> >> > >> >> > Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> writes: >> >> >>> So what do you suggest that testers who want to, say, build old Linux >> >> >>> kernel versions with new binutils do? >> >> > >> >> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Andreas Schwab <schwab@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> >> The same that testers have to do in order to build old Linux kernel >> >> >> versions with current versions of make. >> >> > >> >> > Are you saying it's OK to screw over binutils users because GNU Make >> >> > did that too? >> >> >> >> I'm just telling you the facts. >> > >> > And you are wrong - latest Make does not break reasonably old kernel builds such >> > as v2.6.30. >> >> This is just ridiculous. >> You are defining away facts just because they don't fit your view. > > No, i actually tried out the latest released Make version (3.82) and it still builds > v2.6.30 fine: That's a very convincing argument. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E "And now for something completely different."
- Previous message (by thread): PATCH: Add --size-check=[error|warning]
- Next message (by thread): PATCH: Add --size-check=[error|warning]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list