PATCH: DragonFly support, attempt #3
John Marino
binutils@marino.st
Sat Mar 26 11:55:00 GMT 2011
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Sat Mar 26 11:55:00 GMT 2011
- Previous message (by thread): PATCH: DragonFly support, attempt #3
- Next message (by thread): PATCH: DragonFly support, attempt #3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Clifton wrote: > > I will be happy to commit the mainstream binutils part of the patch > after one small matter is resolved - your patch does not include the new > gas/config/te-dragonfly.h file. If you can send that, then I will check > all of the bfd, gas and ld changes in. I will also check in the changes > to the top level configure and configure.ac scripts and propagate them > to the FSF GCC respository. > Thanks, Nick. Sorry about the missing te-dragonfly.h file. My "git fu" isn't as good as it should be. I have regenerated the entire patch set and attached them here along with the same commit messages as before for convenience. I think the entire attached patchset is "mainstream" binutils. By the way, can you take a closer look at ldlex.l change? I've gotten feedback that the proper fix for the duplicate YY_NO_UNPUT macro definition is just to remove the line "#define YY_NO_UNPUT" since the first line "%option nounput" always defines YY_NO_UNPUT. If you agree with that feedback, you'd want to change the ldlex.l patch although leaving it as it is doesn't do any harm. > I am not planing on applying the patch to the 2.21 branch since this > patch is adding a new feature, not fixing a regression. I would disagree. Dragonfly is not a new feature, it was supported before as can be seen within the patches. This patchset fixes existing but broken functionality, so I would say it's appropriate for 2.21 as well. If you really > feel that it is needed there then please persuade Tristan Gingold to > apply it for you. > > Cheers > Nick Thanks for your help, it's greatly appreciated. Regards, John -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: binutils_221.D.patch URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/attachments/20110326/f603923a/attachment.ksh> -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: binutils-current.D.patch URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/attachments/20110326/f603923a/attachment-0001.ksh> -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: 2011_03_23_changelog.ld.txt URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/attachments/20110326/f603923a/attachment.txt> -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: 2011_03_23_changelog.txt URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/attachments/20110326/f603923a/attachment-0001.txt> -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: 2011_03_23_changelog.bfd.txt URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/attachments/20110326/f603923a/attachment-0002.txt> -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: 2011_03_23_changelog.gas.txt URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/attachments/20110326/f603923a/attachment-0003.txt>
- Previous message (by thread): PATCH: DragonFly support, attempt #3
- Next message (by thread): PATCH: DragonFly support, attempt #3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list