Release 2.22: Next week ...
Matthew Gretton-Dann
matthew.gretton-dann@arm.com
Thu Nov 17 15:10:00 GMT 2011
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Thu Nov 17 15:10:00 GMT 2011
- Previous message (by thread): Release 2.22: Next week ...
- Next message (by thread): Release 2.22: Next week ...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 17/11/11 14:50, Tristan Gingold wrote: > On Nov 9, 2011, at 10:25 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I plan to make the 2.22 release next week. >> There are still a few pending back ports: micromips and 'V2 of get symbol linker plugin interface' come to my mind. >> >> As usual, speak up if you think I missed something. > > I have run the testsuite for most of the targets. I think there aren't blocking regressions for a 22.0, although I think it would be nice to clean-up arm-eabi and mips*-* for the 22.1 > arm-eabi: FAIL: R_ARM_THM_JUMP24 Relocation veneers: Long > arm-eabi: FAIL: R_ARM_THM_JUMP24 Relocation veneers: Short 1 > arm-eabi: FAIL: R_ARM_THM_JUMP24 Relocation veneers: Short 2 I thought I had fixed these with: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2011-11/msg00072.html Which was committed: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2011-11/msg00042.html When I run the tests myself targetting arm-none-eabi they pass, as they also (I am assuming) in your arm-linux-gnueabi run (you didn't highlight them there). Do you mind sending me the appropriate part of ld.log from the testrun and I will try to see if I can reproduce the failure? Thanks, Matt -- Matthew Gretton-Dann Principal Engineer, PD Software - Tools, ARM Ltd
- Previous message (by thread): Release 2.22: Next week ...
- Next message (by thread): Release 2.22: Next week ...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list