Gprof output in 2.21.1 different than in 2.21.53
Nick Clifton
nickc@redhat.com
Tue Oct 25 09:56:00 GMT 2011
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Tue Oct 25 09:56:00 GMT 2011
- Previous message (by thread): Gprof output in 2.21.1 different than in 2.21.53
- Next message (by thread): tweak ppc64 error messages
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Tamer, > Is there a place where those changes in gprof's output are documented? Yes - gprof/bsd_callg_bl.m and gprof/gprof.texi. > I would like to know if I have to rewrite my parser I think that you are going to have to rewrite/extend your parser. > What seems to have changes is the<cycle> tags. Are you *sure* that the version of gprof that you are using is the only thing that has changed ? The kind of output that you are describing can be generated by the 2.21.1 version of gprof. I suspect that what has actually changed is the compiler that you are using and that you are now seeing the results of function inlining that was not happening before. Cheers Nick
- Previous message (by thread): Gprof output in 2.21.1 different than in 2.21.53
- Next message (by thread): tweak ppc64 error messages
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list