[PATCH] MIPS: Opcode membership proposal
Maciej W. Rozycki
macro@codesourcery.com
Mon Aug 13 14:56:00 GMT 2012
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Mon Aug 13 14:56:00 GMT 2012
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] MIPS: Opcode membership proposal
- Next message (by thread): ppc 32/64 elf script question
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, 12 Aug 2012, Richard Sandiford wrote: > > Hmm, where's the typo? That's supposed to be true as long as the CPU is > > other than Octeon or the Octeon exclusion bit is zero. Did I get that > > wrong? > > The typo is in the last line I quoted: > > >> > + && ((cpu != CPU_OCTEON || ((insn)->exclusions & CPU_OCTEON) == 0) > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > CPU_OCTEON is an enum value (6501), not a bitmask value. As I say, > it looked like it should be "((insn)->exclusions & INSN_OCTEON) == 0" > instead. Awww! > Patch is OK. And now in, thanks. Maciej
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] MIPS: Opcode membership proposal
- Next message (by thread): ppc 32/64 elf script question
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list