68hc11/12/s12x/xgate patch

James Murray jsm@jsm-net.demon.co.uk
Sun Feb 26 23:54:00 GMT 2012
Status update.

On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 14:41 +0000, nick clifton wrote:
> Hi James,

> *) You have included a patch to the top level configure file, but not 
> the top level configure.ac file (from which the configure file is 
> generated).

I've removed my changes and used the existing build targets.

> *) You have included a patch to the top level config.sub file.  Are you 
> aware that this patch needs to be submitted to a different project ? 
> (config-patches@gnu.org)

I've removed my changes and used the existing build targets.

> *) You have included patches to various ChangeLogs.  Common practice is 
> just to include changelog entries as plain text, since they almost never 
> apply cleanly as patches.

Ready to submit as plain text.

> *) You have added new options to the m68hc11 GAS port, but not added 
> documentation for these new options to the gas/doc/c-m68hc11.texi file.

OK, added.

> *) You have added support for a new processor, but not mentioned it in 
> either gas/NEWS or ld/NEWS.

OK, added.

> *) There are some formatting problems.  Ideally we like code that 
> follows the GNU Coding Standard: http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/

Understood and hopefully now addressed.

I intend to spend some more time reviewing my patch and will re-submit
once I have completed that.

regards

James Murray



More information about the Binutils mailing list