Alan Modra amodra@gmail.com
Wed Oct 3 06:33:00 GMT 2012

• Previous message (by thread): [committed] TILE-Gx GOLD: better offset ranges for large got.
• Next message (by thread): [committed] TILE-Gx GOLD: better offset ranges for large got.
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 06:23:09AM +0000, Jiong Wang wrote:
>   And tilegx do not have x86_64 style got header, we only reserve the first entry in .got which kept the address of .dynamic, all .plt stub will not be affected by the _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ 

So your dynamic loader uses the first entry in the .got section for
the address of .dynamic rather than the entry pointed to by
_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_?

-- 
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM

---

• Previous message (by thread): [committed] TILE-Gx GOLD: better offset ranges for large got.
• Next message (by thread): [committed] TILE-Gx GOLD: better offset ranges for large got.
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Binutils mailing list