[PATCH] x86-64: j?cxz cleanup
H.J. Lu
hjl.tools@gmail.com
Mon Apr 8 15:37:00 GMT 2013
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Mon Apr 8 15:37:00 GMT 2013
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] x86-64: j?cxz cleanup
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH] arm: also support sp_fiq spelling alongside SP_fiq
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 2:02 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote: > There's no need for two separate opcode entries for JECXZ. And rather than > having an ad-hoc test of the instruction at the end of x86-64-opcode.s, fill > out the section previously established for it (but left empty). Once at it, > also fill out the similar LOOP section, and correct comments in the Jcc one. > > Jan > > gas/testsuite/ > 2013-04-08 Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> > > * gas/i386/x86-64-opcode.s: Flesh out LOOP and J*CXZ sections. > Correct comments in Jcc section. > * gas/i386/x86-64-opcode.d: Refresh. > * gas/i386/ilp32/x86-64-opcode.d: Refresh. > > opcodes/ > 2013-04-08 Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> > > * i386-opc.tbl: Fold 64-bit and non-64-bit jecxz entries. > * i386-tbl.h: Re-generate. > > --- 2013-04-08/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/ilp32/x86-64-opcode.d > +++ 2013-04-08/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/ilp32/x86-64-opcode.d > @@ -52,6 +52,11 @@ Disassembly of section .text: > [ ]*[a-f0-9]+: 48 0f c3 00 movnti %rax,\(%rax\) > [ ]*[a-f0-9]+: 4d 0f c3 00 movnti %r8,\(%r8\) > [ ]*[a-f0-9]+: 4c 0f c3 00 movnti %r8,\(%rax\) > +[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: e2 fe loop 0x[0-9a-f]+ > +[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: e2 fe loop 0x[0-9a-f]+ > +[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: 67 e2 fd loopl 0x[0-9a-f]+ > +[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: e3 fe jrcxz 0x[0-9a-f]+ > +[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: 67 e3 fd jecxz 0x[0-9a-f]+ > [ ]*[a-f0-9]+: 41 f6 38 idivb \(%r8\) > [ ]*[a-f0-9]+: f6 38 idivb \(%rax\) > [ ]*[a-f0-9]+: 66 41 f7 38 idivw \(%r8\) > --- 2013-04-08/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-opcode.d > +++ 2013-04-08/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-opcode.d > @@ -51,6 +51,11 @@ Disassembly of section .text: > [ ]*[a-f0-9]+: 48 0f c3 00 movnti %rax,\(%rax\) > [ ]*[a-f0-9]+: 4d 0f c3 00 movnti %r8,\(%r8\) > [ ]*[a-f0-9]+: 4c 0f c3 00 movnti %r8,\(%rax\) > +[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: e2 fe loop 0x[0-9a-f]+ > +[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: e2 fe loop 0x[0-9a-f]+ > +[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: 67 e2 fd loopl 0x[0-9a-f]+ > +[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: e3 fe jrcxz 0x[0-9a-f]+ > +[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: 67 e3 fd jecxz 0x[0-9a-f]+ > [ ]*[a-f0-9]+: 41 f6 38 idivb \(%r8\) > [ ]*[a-f0-9]+: f6 38 idivb \(%rax\) > [ ]*[a-f0-9]+: 66 41 f7 38 idivw \(%r8\) > @@ -296,5 +301,4 @@ Disassembly of section .text: > [ ]*[a-f0-9]+: 0f 07 sysret > [ ]*[a-f0-9]+: 0f 01 f8 swapgs > [ ]*[a-f0-9]+: 66 68 22 22 pushw \$0x2222 > -[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: 67 e3 ff jecxz 0x49d > #pass > --- 2013-04-08/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-opcode.s > +++ 2013-04-08/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-opcode.s > @@ -61,15 +61,18 @@ > # Conditionals > > # LOOP > + LOOP . # -- -- -- -- E2 FE ; RCX used as counter. > + LOOPq . # -- -- -- -- E2 FE ; RCX used as counter. > + LOOPl . # -- 67 -- -- E2 FD ; ECX used as counter. > > > # Jcc > - # 66 -- -- -- 77 FD ; A16 override: (Addr64) = ZEXT(Addr16) > - # 66 -- -- -- 0F 87 F9 FF FF FF ; A16 override: (Addr64) = ZEXT(Addr16) > + # 66 -- -- -- 77 FD ; O16 override: (Addr64) = ZEXT(Addr16) > + # 66 -- -- -- 0F 87 F9 FF FF FF ; O16 override: (Addr64) = ZEXT(Addr16) > > # J*CXZ > - # 66 67 -- -- E3 FC ; ECX used as counter. A16 override: (Addr64) = ZEXT(Addr16) > - # 66 -- -- -- E3 FD ; A16 override: (Addr64) = ZEXT(Addr16) > + JRCXZ . # -- -- -- -- E3 FE ; RCX used as counter. > + JECXZ . # -- 67 -- -- E3 FD ; ECX used as counter. > > > > @@ -424,5 +427,3 @@ > swapgs # -- -- -- -- 0F 01 f8 > > pushw $0x2222 > - > - jecxz .+2 > --- 2013-04-08/opcodes/i386-opc.tbl > +++ 2013-04-08/opcodes/i386-opc.tbl > @@ -389,8 +389,7 @@ jg, 1, 0x7f, None, 1, 0, Jump|No_bSuf|No > > // jcxz vs. jecxz is chosen on the basis of the address size prefix. > jcxz, 1, 0xe3, None, 1, CpuNo64, JumpByte|Size16|No_bSuf|No_wSuf|No_lSuf|No_sSuf|No_qSuf|No_ldSuf, { Disp8|Disp16|Disp32 } > -jecxz, 1, 0xe3, None, 1, CpuNo64, JumpByte|Size32|No_bSuf|No_wSuf|No_lSuf|No_sSuf|No_qSuf|No_ldSuf, { Disp8|Disp16|Disp32 } > -jecxz, 1, 0xe3, None, 1, Cpu64, JumpByte|Size32|No_bSuf|No_wSuf|No_lSuf|No_sSuf|No_qSuf|No_ldSuf, { Disp8|Disp32|Disp32S } > +jecxz, 1, 0xe3, None, 1, 0, JumpByte|Size32|No_bSuf|No_wSuf|No_lSuf|No_sSuf|No_qSuf|No_ldSuf, { Disp8|Disp16|Disp32|Disp32S } > jrcxz, 1, 0xe3, None, 1, Cpu64, JumpByte|Size64|No_bSuf|No_wSuf|No_lSuf|No_sSuf|No_qSuf|No_ldSuf|NoRex64, { Disp8|Disp32|Disp32S } > > // The loop instructions also use the address size prefix to select > > It is OK. Thanks. -- H.J.
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] x86-64: j?cxz cleanup
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH] arm: also support sp_fiq spelling alongside SP_fiq
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list