[PATCH/RFC 02/02 v2] Refactor PRPSINFO handling on GDB
Sergio Durigan Junior
sergiodj@redhat.com
Fri Jan 11 17:03:00 GMT 2013
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Fri Jan 11 17:03:00 GMT 2013
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH/RFC 02/02 v2] Refactor PRPSINFO handling on GDB
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH/RFC 02/02 v2] Refactor PRPSINFO handling on GDB
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Friday, January 11 2013, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 01/11/2013 03:53 AM, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>>>> + /* Generating and copying the program's arguments. `get_inferior_args'
>>>> + may throw, but we want to continue the execution anyway. */
>>>> + TRY_CATCH (ex, RETURN_MASK_ERROR)
>>>> + {
>>>> + infargs = get_inferior_args ();
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>
>>> Hmm? We were not doing that before. What exception is that?
>>
>> `get_inferior_args' calls `construct_inferior_arguments', which can call
>> `error' in an specific scenario (not STARTUP_WITH_SHELL, arguments that
>> contain spaces).
>
> This is an example of something that should be split into
> its own change, along with its own rationale. This is
> independent of any refactoring of PRPSINFO handling.
> We're already calling get_inferior_args nowadays, and I don't
> ever remember this error being reported as a problem.
My first version of the patch didn't contain the TRY_CATCH part. It was
Jan who made this suggestion, and I thought it made sense.
I really think a TRY_CATCH does not cause any harm here, but if you
insist, I can easily remove it from the patch.
--
Sergio
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH/RFC 02/02 v2] Refactor PRPSINFO handling on GDB
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH/RFC 02/02 v2] Refactor PRPSINFO handling on GDB
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list