stabs/dwarf size comparison on CSiBE (Was: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb)
Jan Kratochvil
jan.kratochvil@redhat.com
Tue Jan 15 17:53:00 GMT 2013
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Tue Jan 15 17:53:00 GMT 2013
- Previous message (by thread): stabs/dwarf size comparison on CSiBE (Was: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb)
- Next message (by thread): stabs/dwarf size comparison on CSiBE (Was: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 11:09:46 +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote: > Unless someone can shoot holes in this test approach, While the sum of *.o files sizes may make sense in some cases I would find more useful to measure it only for the final executables and after they have been processed by dwz. Besides dwz also .debug_* sections relocations have large size and all these relocations get removed in the final executable. Thanks, Jan
- Previous message (by thread): stabs/dwarf size comparison on CSiBE (Was: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb)
- Next message (by thread): stabs/dwarf size comparison on CSiBE (Was: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list