PATCH: Add R_386_SIZE32/R_X86_64_SIZE32/R_X86_64_SIZE64 support to bfd
David Miller
davem@davemloft.net
Wed Jan 16 23:40:00 GMT 2013
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Wed Jan 16 23:40:00 GMT 2013
- Previous message (by thread): PATCH: Add R_386_SIZE32/R_X86_64_SIZE32/R_X86_64_SIZE64 support to bfd
- Next message (by thread): PATCH: Add R_386_SIZE32/R_X86_64_SIZE32/R_X86_64_SIZE64 support to bfd
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
From: "H.J. Lu" <hongjiu.lu@intel.com> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:42:29 -0800 > I am waiting for Solaris feedback so that we can have the same > assembly syntax with Solaris assembler if possible. It looks like the Solaris assembler has no support for generating these relocations. Instead, the intention seems to be for the dtrace tools to generate these relocations by hand, as mentioned here:. http://web.archiveorange.com/archive/v/KGyKyS8JaGMawGhL882p So we can use whatever syntax we want in GAS.
- Previous message (by thread): PATCH: Add R_386_SIZE32/R_X86_64_SIZE32/R_X86_64_SIZE64 support to bfd
- Next message (by thread): PATCH: Add R_386_SIZE32/R_X86_64_SIZE32/R_X86_64_SIZE64 support to bfd
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list