Home Original page

[PATCH] dwarf.c handle new DWARFv5 C11, C++11 and C++14 DW_LANG constants.

Alan Modra amodra@gmail.com
Thu Dec 4 11:35:00 GMT 2014 
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 08:22:24AM +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> 
> On 01/12/14 17:16, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> >On Fri, 2014-11-28 at 13:03 +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> >>>On 28/11/14 12:19, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> >>>> >On Fri, 2014-11-28 at 12:03 +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> >>>>> >>On 27/11/14 16:14, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> >>>>>> >>>On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 16:09 +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> >>>>>>>> >>>>>Out of curiosity why is this "ANSI C11" and not simply "C11" (like
> >>>>>>>> >>>>>"C++11") or "ISO C11"?
> >>>>>> >>>No particular reason, except to be consistent with the existing naming
> >>>>>> >>>used. DW_LANG_C89 was already "ANSI C" and DW_LANG_C_plus_plus was
> >>>>>> >>>already "C++".
> >>>>> >>As far as I know there is no ANSI C11, the standard is ISO/IEC 9899:2011.
> >>>> >What is you recommendation then? Currently we have DW_LANG_C89/"ANSI C",
> >>>> >DW_LANG_C/"non-ANSI C", DW_LANG_C99/"ANSI C99" and DW_LANG_C11/"ANSI
> >>>> >C11".
> >>>
> >>>I would simply use "C11".
> >OK. Patch attached.
> 
> Thanks for the patch.  Are there any objections to apply it?

Please commit.

-- 
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM
More information about the Binutils mailing list