copyright dates in binutils (and includes/)
Richard Sandiford
rsandifo@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Mon Mar 3 13:33:00 GMT 2014
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Mon Mar 3 13:33:00 GMT 2014
- Previous message (by thread): copyright dates in binutils (and includes/)
- Next message (by thread): copyright dates in binutils (and includes/)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 02:14:51PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote: >> I'll post update-copyright.py separately. Thanks for doing this, looks good to me FWIW. I don't know whether we want to keep a single script for both GCC and binutils+gdb or fork, but probably separate copies makes sense. As far as including include/ goes: the only reason that didn't happen for gcc/ was because I didn't want to sort out which files were GCC- specific and whether binutils, GCC or GDB was the master for each file. So if we do your option (b) I think we should do (c) as well. I suppose that means syncing GCC's include/ with binutils+gdb and then adding GCC's include/ to the list of "approved" directories. I'm happy to try that if it sounds OK. (Maybe after the 4.9 release, not sure.) Thanks, Richard
- Previous message (by thread): copyright dates in binutils (and includes/)
- Next message (by thread): copyright dates in binutils (and includes/)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list