gold vs libc
Carlos O'Donell
carlos@redhat.com
Sun Mar 30 18:28:00 GMT 2014
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Sun Mar 30 18:28:00 GMT 2014
- Previous message (by thread): gold vs libc
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH] [AArch64] Fixup ld-aarch64/eh-frame.d expected PC range.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 03/30/2014 12:25 AM, Roland McGrath wrote: > On the glibc.git branch roland/gold-vs-libc is the trivial configure change > necessary to let glibc attempt to build using gold as the linker. (The > version check with that change is excessively loose--to boot, it admits > current gold versions so you can test, even though they don't work enough.) Enabling gold is BZ #14995. https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14995 ... and to link to the old discussion with more patches for configure: https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2013-01/msg00274.html Cheres, Carlos.
- Previous message (by thread): gold vs libc
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH] [AArch64] Fixup ld-aarch64/eh-frame.d expected PC range.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list