RFC: Optimize out i386/x86-64 JUMP_SLOT relocation
Roland McGrath
roland@hack.frob.com
Mon Nov 24 21:02:00 GMT 2014
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Mon Nov 24 21:02:00 GMT 2014
- Previous message (by thread): RFC: Optimize out i386/x86-64 JUMP_SLOT relocation
- Next message (by thread): RFC: Optimize out i386/x86-64 JUMP_SLOT relocation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
We could change the test to grok that case. We just need to find a way to change it such that we can be confident that the internal calls in the module are actually going via that GOT slot even though there is no JMPREL reloc for it. We're already assuming that the presence of any PLT entry for the symbol name means all calls are using the PLT. So it is probably just as safe to assume that the presence of a GOT reloc for the symbol name means calls are using that slot.
- Previous message (by thread): RFC: Optimize out i386/x86-64 JUMP_SLOT relocation
- Next message (by thread): RFC: Optimize out i386/x86-64 JUMP_SLOT relocation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list