What have you done to strings!
Tristan Gingold
gingold@adacore.com
Wed Oct 29 08:00:00 GMT 2014
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Wed Oct 29 08:00:00 GMT 2014
- Previous message (by thread): What have you done to strings!
- Next message (by thread): What have you done to strings!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> On 28 Oct 2014, at 23:19, Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > > Again, you are 35 years late. strings has *always* been "smart" by > default. Right, but I won't be against making -a the default. First, it would still be posix compliant (-a is implementation defined). Second, it is safer and easier to implement. Third, I suppose the use of strings in scripts is tiny. Fourth, 'strings -a' is more useful than 'strings'. 35 years ago, there was only code in .text. Nowadays (and since 'const' is part of C), strings and const are in .text; so having -a the default would be more compatible with the old behaviour. Well, IMHO. Tristan.
- Previous message (by thread): What have you done to strings!
- Next message (by thread): What have you done to strings!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list