S_FORCE_RELOC intended behavior?
Alan Modra
amodra@gmail.com
Sat Aug 22 08:03:00 GMT 2015
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Sat Aug 22 08:03:00 GMT 2015
- Previous message (by thread): S_FORCE_RELOC intended behavior?
- Next message (by thread): Segmentation fault of 'objdump -x' in binutils-2.25.1
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:40:24PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > This behavior changed with the above-linked commit. Yes, back to 2.12 behaviour. A change prior to the one you fingered emitted relocs, and proved to be troublesome. -- Alan Modra Australia Development Lab, IBM
- Previous message (by thread): S_FORCE_RELOC intended behavior?
- Next message (by thread): Segmentation fault of 'objdump -x' in binutils-2.25.1
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list