Yaakov Selkowitz yselkowi@redhat.com
Sun Aug 23 19:37:00 GMT 2015

• Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] config: fix AM_ICONV for in-tree libiconv
• Next message (by thread): [PATCH] config: fix AM_ICONV for in-tree libiconv
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On Sat, 2015-08-22 at 18:04 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> I noticed that regenerating binutils/configure or gdb/configure
> undoes the libiconv changes done here:
[snip] 
> However, that commit does not include any config/iconv.m4/AM_ICONV
> change.  Looks like you forgot to attach the config/iconv.m4 patch, and
> then only the regeneration bits were pushed (both binutils-gdb git
> and gcc svn)?

Looks like I forgot to repost that part of the patchset; attached.

-- 
Yaakov Selkowitz
Associate Software Engineer, ARM
Red Hat, Inc.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0002-config-libiconv.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 3452 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/attachments/20150823/6be19755/attachment.bin>

---

• Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] config: fix AM_ICONV for in-tree libiconv
• Next message (by thread): [PATCH] config: fix AM_ICONV for in-tree libiconv
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Binutils mailing list