Jan Beulich JBeulich@suse.com
Tue May 12 15:09:00 GMT 2015

• Previous message (by thread): [committed, PATCH] Remove Disp16|Disp32 from 64-bit direct branches
• Next message (by thread): [committed, PATCH] Remove Disp16|Disp32 from 64-bit direct branches
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

>>> On 12.05.15 at 17:03, <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 7:59 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>> Yes. But then what was the point of you ripping out Disp16?
> 
> I removed it since it doesn't jump to the target.  Can you verify
> that it does jump to "(nextip + disp16) & 0xffff, not jump to
> "(nextip + disp16)"?

Yes - see the gdb output I provided yesterday.

Jan

---

• Previous message (by thread): [committed, PATCH] Remove Disp16|Disp32 from 64-bit direct branches
• Next message (by thread): [committed, PATCH] Remove Disp16|Disp32 from 64-bit direct branches
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Binutils mailing list