[patch] Use unaligned access on x86_64
Rafael Espíndola
rafael.espindola@gmail.com
Wed May 20 13:01:00 GMT 2015
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Wed May 20 13:01:00 GMT 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [Patch, tentative] Show output section size contribution from each input file in map file
- Next message (by thread): [patch] Use unaligned access on x86_64
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
ping. On 27 April 2015 at 15:09, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola@gmail.com> wrote: > I tested this on my linux workstation with a debug build of clang. The > results are still very interesting. > > The perf logs are attached. > > Cheers, > Rafael > > > On 24 April 2015 at 10:54, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> x86_64 has exquisite support for unaligned loads. It is a shame not to use it. >> >> The attached patch avoids aligning archive members on x86_64. The >> results when linking clang are very interesting: >> >> * massif reports that the malloc memory usage goes from 331,295,192 >> bytes to just 133,415,136 bytes. >> >> * the linking time (30 runs average) goes from >> >> 1.310065610 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.19% ) >> >> to >> >> 1.162564763 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.14% ) >> >> >> Cheers, >> Rafael >> >> >> 2015-04-24 Rafael Ávila de Espíndola <rafael.espindola@gmail.com> >> >> * fileread.cc (find_or_make_view): Don't align on x86_64.
- Previous message (by thread): [Patch, tentative] Show output section size contribution from each input file in map file
- Next message (by thread): [patch] Use unaligned access on x86_64
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list