Avoiding unnecessary jump relocations in gas?
H. Peter Anvin
hpa@zytor.com
Wed May 20 21:00:00 GMT 2015
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Wed May 20 21:00:00 GMT 2015
- Previous message (by thread): Avoiding unnecessary jump relocations in gas?
- Next message (by thread): Avoiding unnecessary jump relocations in gas?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 05/20/2015 01:53 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > Egads. Now I understand what that code is. I don't like the balign, > since this has nothing to do with alignment -- we're creating an array > of functions. Actually it does... we align to the beginning of each slot. If .balign could be something other than a power of 2 that would work, too. I was mostly looking to minimize the amount of gas magic we rely on. > Can't we make it explicit? > > #define EARLY_IDT_HANDLER_STRIDE 9 > > ... > > .rept NUM_EXCEPTION_VECTORS > . = early_idt_handlers + i * EARLY_IDT_HANDLER_STRIDE > .if (EXCEPTION_ERRCODE_MASK >> i) & 1 > ASM_NOP2 > .else > pushl $0 # Dummy error code, to make stack frame uniform > .endif > pushl $i # 20(%esp) Vector number > jmp early_idt_handler > i = i + 1 > .endr > > gas will error out if we try to move . backwards, so this should be safe. If that works too with all the versions of gas we care about, that would be fine (and I do appreciate the explicitness.) However, .[b]align is something that will have been well exercised in every version of gas, so I do feel slightly safer with it. -hpa
- Previous message (by thread): Avoiding unnecessary jump relocations in gas?
- Next message (by thread): Avoiding unnecessary jump relocations in gas?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list