[PATCH] x86/Intel: accept mandated operand order for vcvt{,u}si2s{d,s}
H.J. Lu
hjl.tools@gmail.com
Thu May 21 10:42:00 GMT 2015
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Thu May 21 10:42:00 GMT 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] x86/Intel: accept mandated operand order for vcvt{,u}si2s{d,s}
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH] x86/Intel: accept mandated operand order for vcvt{,u}si2s{d,s}
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 11:30 PM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote: >>>> On 06.05.15 at 09:44, <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote: >> Please don't just repeat yourself, but give a reason I can understand >> to override the intention to conform with the Intel manual. I'm >> certainly hesitant to commit changes that can't be agreed upon, but >> as said before I don't feel tied to your disapproval of the changes. > > I guess I'll take two weeks of silence as silent withdrawal of the > objection to the patches then. Please don't change it. As I said before, we have discussed it at Intel and we don't think the change is appropriate. -- H.J.
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] x86/Intel: accept mandated operand order for vcvt{,u}si2s{d,s}
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH] x86/Intel: accept mandated operand order for vcvt{,u}si2s{d,s}
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list