[LD, ARM] Fix in STM32L4XX patch
Christophe Lyon
christophe.lyon@linaro.org
Sun Nov 15 16:26:00 GMT 2015
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Sun Nov 15 16:26:00 GMT 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [LD, ARM] Fix in STM32L4XX patch
- Next message (by thread): [LD, ARM] Fix in STM32L4XX patch
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
ping? On 6 November 2015 at 16:51, Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org> wrote: > Hi, > > While running the linker tests on a 32-bits i686 host with > enable-64-bit-bfd=yes, I noticed that a test of the STM32L4XX patch > was failing. > > This is because it expects a message containing an out-of-range > offset, and does not print the right value: the print format contains > %d while the value is of type long long. > > The attached small patch fixes that by forcing %ld and casting the > value to (long), as it seems to be standard practice elsewhere in the > binutils, although not very clean. > > Nick, don't you see this error? > > OK? > > Christophe.
- Previous message (by thread): [LD, ARM] Fix in STM32L4XX patch
- Next message (by thread): [LD, ARM] Fix in STM32L4XX patch
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list