Christophe Lyon christophe.lyon@linaro.org
Tue Nov 17 19:29:00 GMT 2015

• Previous message (by thread): [LD, ARM] Fix in STM32L4XX patch
• Next message (by thread): [Proposed patch] Huge performance regression in ld -r since binutils >= 2.21
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On 17 November 2015 at 12:39, Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi Christophe,
>
>> The attached small patch fixes that by forcing %ld and casting the
>> value to (long), as it seems to be standard practice elsewhere in the
>> binutils, although not very clean.
>
>
> Thanks - I have now applied the patch.  (Sorry about the delay in
> responding).
>
Thanks

>> Nick, don't you see this error?
>
> Strangely no.  I do build a 32-bit only version of the toolchain, but the
> problem did not show up.  Strange.
>
Indeed, I tried to reproduce the configuration in which you saw a problem
with a cast in the STM32L4XX patch.

Thanks

> Cheers
>   Nick
>
>

---

• Previous message (by thread): [LD, ARM] Fix in STM32L4XX patch
• Next message (by thread): [Proposed patch] Huge performance regression in ld -r since binutils >= 2.21
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Binutils mailing list