[PATCH] Missing TO_ADDR
Dan
dgisselq@verizon.net
Fri Apr 1 14:42:00 GMT 2016
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Fri Apr 1 14:42:00 GMT 2016
- Previous message (by thread): Missing TO_ADDR
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH] Missing TO_ADDR
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alan, Sorry, I'm still kind of new to the whole idea of posting patches. Will this work better? 2016-04-01 Dan Gisselquist <dgisselq@ieee.org> * ld/ldlang.c: Updated minfo lines so that map file sizes are given in the target machines address units. * ld/ldlang.c: Fixed three other references to section sizes that didn't go through the size in octets to target address units translation I used diff -Naur -up this time ... (Rest of patch attached) Dan On Fri, 2016-04-01 at 12:01 +1030, Alan Modra wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 12:03:17PM -0400, Dan wrote: > > This would be my proposal for what to change: > > I'll approve a patch that is against current master, diff -up > preferred, and has a changelog. Please repost. > -------------- next part -------------- diff -Naur -up a/ld/ChangeLog b/ld/ChangeLog --- a/ld/ChangeLog 2016-04-01 10:36:46.571415208 -0400 +++ b/ld/ChangeLog 2016-04-01 10:40:00.458440792 -0400 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +2016-04-01 Dan Gisselquist <dgisselq@ieee.org> + + * ld/ldlang.c: Updated minfo lines so that map file sizes are + given in the target machines address units. + * ld/ldlang.c: Fixed three other references to section sizes + that didn't go through the size in octets to target address + units translation + 2016-02-23 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com> * testsuite/ld-frv/fdpic-pie-6.d: Updated. diff -Naur -up a/ld/ldlang.c b/ld/ldlang.c --- a/ld/ldlang.c 2016-03-31 11:52:02.147253098 -0400 +++ b/ld/ldlang.c 2016-03-31 12:01:13.039773821 -0400 @@ -1886,7 +1886,7 @@ lang_insert_orphan (asection *s, before sizing dynamic sections. */ dot = os->bfd_section->vma; exp_fold_tree (start_assign->exp, os->bfd_section, &dot); - dot += s->size; + dot += TO_ADDR(s->size); exp_fold_tree (stop_assign->exp, os->bfd_section, &dot); } @@ -4002,7 +4002,7 @@ print_output_section_statement ++len; } - minfo ("0x%V %W", section->vma, section->size); + minfo ("0x%V %W", section->vma, TO_ADDR(section->size)); if (section->vma != section->lma) minfo (_(" load address 0x%V"), section->lma); @@ -4312,7 +4312,9 @@ print_data_statement (lang_data_statemen break; } - minfo ("0x%V %W %s 0x%v", addr, size, name, data->value); + if (size < TO_SIZE ((unsigned) 1)) + size = TO_SIZE ((unsigned) 1); + minfo ("0x%V %W %s 0x%v", addr, TO_ADDR(size), name, data->value); if (data->exp->type.node_class != etree_value) { @@ -4355,7 +4357,7 @@ print_reloc_statement (lang_reloc_statem size = bfd_get_reloc_size (reloc->howto); - minfo ("0x%V %W RELOC %s ", addr, size, reloc->howto->name); + minfo ("0x%V %W RELOC %s ", addr, TO_ADDR(size), reloc->howto->name); if (reloc->name != NULL) minfo ("%s+", reloc->name); @@ -4388,7 +4390,7 @@ print_padding_statement (lang_padding_st addr = s->output_offset; if (s->output_section != NULL) addr += s->output_section->vma; - minfo ("0x%V %W ", addr, (bfd_vma) s->size); + minfo ("0x%V %W ", addr, TO_ADDR((bfd_vma) s->size)); if (s->fill->size != 0) { @@ -5067,7 +5069,7 @@ lang_size_sections_1 create overlapping LMAs. */ if (dot < last->vma && os->bfd_section->size != 0 - && dot + os->bfd_section->size <= last->vma) + && dot + TO_ADDR(os->bfd_section->size) <= last->vma) { /* If dot moved backwards then leave lma equal to vma. This is the old default lma, which might @@ -5084,7 +5086,7 @@ lang_size_sections_1 /* If this is an overlay, set the current lma to that at the end of the previous section. */ if (os->sectype == overlay_section) - lma = last->lma + last->size; + lma = last->lma + TO_ADDR(last->size); /* Otherwise, keep the same lma to vma relationship as the previous section. */
- Previous message (by thread): Missing TO_ADDR
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH] Missing TO_ADDR
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list