Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248]
Cary Coutant
ccoutant@gmail.com
Tue Apr 19 15:54:00 GMT 2016
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Tue Apr 19 15:54:00 GMT 2016
- Previous message (by thread): Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248]
- Next message (by thread): Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Cary, please stop spreading the incorrect information. There is > at lease one GCC bug against protected symbol: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55012 > > which was reported by other people. OK, so it got reported once by someone else. But that bug was based on an incorrect understanding of protected visibility; the real problem there was the lack of diagnostic from the linker. -cary
- Previous message (by thread): Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248]
- Next message (by thread): Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list