Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248]
Cary Coutant
ccoutant@gmail.com
Tue Apr 19 15:58:00 GMT 2016
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Tue Apr 19 15:58:00 GMT 2016
- Previous message (by thread): Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248]
- Next message (by thread): Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Another old bug: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10908 Filed by you, and resolved (correctly) as invalid. Again, the real problem was the lack of a linker diagnostic. -cary
- Previous message (by thread): Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248]
- Next message (by thread): Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list