Maciej W. Rozycki macro@imgtec.com
Thu Aug 3 11:36:00 GMT 2017

• Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] GDB/opcodes: Remove arch/mach/endian disassembler assertions
• Next message (by thread): [PATCH] GDB/opcodes: Remove arch/mach/endian disassembler assertions
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On Thu, 3 Aug 2017, Yao Qi wrote:

> I prefer to keep these asserts, as they could check the inconsistent
> uses of disassemble_info between gdb and opcodes.  There is another
> assert for target armv5te, PR 21818, but the assert exposes an improper
> or unexpected usage of disassemble_info.mach in opcodes/arm-dis.c.  I am
> fixing it.

 How does the retaining of these assertions interact with `set
architecture' and `set endian' then?

  Maciej

---

• Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] GDB/opcodes: Remove arch/mach/endian disassembler assertions
• Next message (by thread): [PATCH] GDB/opcodes: Remove arch/mach/endian disassembler assertions
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Binutils mailing list