Should we have a 2.29.1 point release ?
H.J. Lu
hjl.tools@gmail.com
Mon Aug 14 23:57:00 GMT 2017
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Mon Aug 14 23:57:00 GMT 2017
- Previous message (by thread): Should we have a 2.29.1 point release ?
- Next message (by thread): Should we have a 2.29.1 point release ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 9:48 AM, Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi Guys, > > I realise that the 2.29 release has only just happened, but it seems > that several important bug fixes have gone into the 2.29 branch, and > I was wondering whether they were enough to justify a 2.29.1 point > release. > > What do people think ? > I think we need 2.29.1. Give OSVs a couple more weeks with 2.29 to work out the most serious bugs. -- H.J.
- Previous message (by thread): Should we have a 2.29.1 point release ?
- Next message (by thread): Should we have a 2.29.1 point release ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list