Linaro vendor branches
Peter Bergner
bergner@vnet.ibm.com
Tue Aug 22 15:24:00 GMT 2017
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Tue Aug 22 15:24:00 GMT 2017
- Previous message (by thread): Linaro vendor branches
- Next message (by thread): New French PO file for 'gprof' (version 2.28.90)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 8/21/17 10:15 AM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote: > Similar to ARM, IBM, and Gentoo [1] I would like to create vendor branches > our Linaro ones under users/linaro. They will be used mainly for > synchronization with fsf branches and development of our toolchain [2]. > > I take from last thread it should be mostly ok, but I would like to check > if someone opposes it. I think we already have consensus that vendor branches are ok, so I'd say go ahead. Peter
- Previous message (by thread): Linaro vendor branches
- Next message (by thread): New French PO file for 'gprof' (version 2.28.90)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list