[PATCH] Disallow copy relocation against protected data symbol
H.J. Lu
hjl.tools@gmail.com
Fri Aug 25 12:17:00 GMT 2017
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Fri Aug 25 12:17:00 GMT 2017
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] Disallow copy relocation against protected data symbol
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH] Disallow copy relocation against protected data symbol
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 09:13:15AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote: >> property. This patch adds a bit to elf_link_hash_entry and elf_obj_tdata > > Why is def_protected needed? Surely it is wrong to record the > visibility of a symbol that may not even be the final definition? > Why not just use visibility directly? ELF_ST_VISIBILITY is only merged with relocatable input. We don't mark an undefined symbol as protected just because the definition comes from a protected symbol in a shared object. A protected symbol is meaningful only for a definition with dynamic relocation. def_protected is updated every time when def_regular or def_dynamic is set. It tracks the visibility of the symbol definition, which can be different from the visibility of the symbol reference. It reflects the visibility of the final definition. -- H.J.
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] Disallow copy relocation against protected data symbol
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH] Disallow copy relocation against protected data symbol
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list