Maciej W. Rozycki macro@linux-mips.org
Mon Oct 9 09:43:00 GMT 2017

• Previous message (by thread): [RFC] .fill does not accept forward labels
• Next message (by thread): [RFC] .fill does not accept forward labels
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On Mon, 9 Oct 2017, Andreas Krebbel wrote:

> diff --git a/gas/testsuite/gas/all/fill-1.s b/gas/testsuite/gas/all/fill-1.s
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..92d495a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gas/testsuite/gas/all/fill-1.s
> @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
> +	.text
> +	.fill (2f-1f), 1, 0x90
> +1:
> +        nop
> +2:

 Have you verified your new test case? -- I think not all targets have a 
`nop' instruction mnemonic.  I reckon this is already handled in other 
tests that need to emit a piece of code across all targets, although ISTM 
here you could have just used a portable data directive instead, such as 
`.word', as it doesn't really matter for the objective of this test what 
is there between the two labels.

  Maciej

---

• Previous message (by thread): [RFC] .fill does not accept forward labels
• Next message (by thread): [RFC] .fill does not accept forward labels
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Binutils mailing list