[PATCH] x86: Add .nop directive to assembler
Maciej W. Rozycki
macro@mips.com
Mon Feb 19 14:45:00 GMT 2018
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Mon Feb 19 14:45:00 GMT 2018
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] x86: Add .nop directive to assembler
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH] x86: Add .nop directive to assembler
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 19 Feb 2018, H.J. Lu wrote: > >> I have a feeling the default should wire in HANDLE_ALIGN somehow. For > >> many targets, such as fixed instruction width RISC processors, there is > >> only going to be one way of filling a given amount of space with no-op > >> instructions, so I think there's no point in having code duplication > >> here. And even if there are more ways possible for a given target, then > >> the `.align' way is still right even if suboptimal. > > > > How would you propose to express "I need three nop > > instructions aka 12 bytes from here" with just .align? (Note: no matter > > how "here" is currently aligned!) > > > > .align isn't the same as .nop. However, HANDLE_ALIGN can be updated > to shared the same code with md_generate_nops, like what I did for x86. Yes, that's what I meant. It's an internal code wiring thing, not to be something observable by the user. Maciej
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] x86: Add .nop directive to assembler
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH] x86: Add .nop directive to assembler
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list